The battle of Queenstown Heights took place in the Niagara region in 1813. The casualties were only of the dozens on both sides of the battle, the greatest loss being that of General Brock. Brock was a well-respected British General who had conquered in all of his previous battles. Though Great Britain successfully stood their ground against the Americans on the battlefront, the death of General Brock was a major loss to the entire British Army. I personally believe that he was the most successful, organized and respected General out of all of the battles of 1812. His strategies of both defence and attack proved the enemies that Great Britain and Canada are a strong force, and are not some territory that will simply be given in good spirits. Though the battle of Queenstown Heights was won by Great Britain I do believe it was in some ways lost.
The American’s launched a surprise attack on the British army when they landed on the shores of Queenstown Heights. Due to that they were able to gain the advantage in numbers by having approximately five times more soldiers than Great-Britain. Therefore GB was for the first time completely thrown off guard and had to act quickly. General Brock led his troops into town where they encountered heavy fire. One musket’s shot pierced a hole through General Brock’s chest, another through his wrist. These wounds resulted in an almost sudden death. I believe that General Brock should have stood his ground at Fort George and wait for more soldiers to arrive. There was no reason to go defend a small town when they had a clear disadvantage in numbers and in organization. Should Brock have stayed at Fort George he would have decreased the amount of casualties, including his own death. Was the battle of Queenstown Heights won by the Brittish even with the loss of the most important General implicated in the war? I believe it is a decisive win for GB, but also a decisive loss. Who knows what General Brock would have accomplished if he were to lead a battalion in the other wars. The very country we know now would be almost entirely different.
The American’s launched a surprise attack on the British army when they landed on the shores of Queenstown Heights. Due to that they were able to gain the advantage in numbers by having approximately five times more soldiers than Great-Britain. Therefore GB was for the first time completely thrown off guard and had to act quickly. General Brock led his troops into town where they encountered heavy fire. One musket’s shot pierced a hole through General Brock’s chest, another through his wrist. These wounds resulted in an almost sudden death. I believe that General Brock should have stood his ground at Fort George and wait for more soldiers to arrive. There was no reason to go defend a small town when they had a clear disadvantage in numbers and in organization. Should Brock have stayed at Fort George he would have decreased the amount of casualties, including his own death. Was the battle of Queenstown Heights won by the Brittish even with the loss of the most important General implicated in the war? I believe it is a decisive win for GB, but also a decisive loss. Who knows what General Brock would have accomplished if he were to lead a battalion in the other wars. The very country we know now would be almost entirely different.
Below is an image of Sir Isaac Brock (General of the 49th batallion) ordering his small batallion to charge towards the 6000 American soldiers that stand before them.
No comments:
Post a Comment